Sujet Brevet 2019 Amérique Du Nord

Découvre cette corrigé du bac aux compréhension d'anglais 2019 donné en america du Nord d’environ la notion ns Myths & Heroes.

Vous lisez ce: Sujet brevet 2019 amérique du nord

Pour mieux assurer dans l’épenthèse révisions bac LV1, ta éducateur de assisté scolaire en file propose ce corrigé bac 2019 d'anglais LV1- séquence L/ LVO / ES/S.

Énoncé ns cette examen écrite ns bac d'anglais 2019

Exercice de compréhension

Sujet du document A

Corrigé bac anglais 2019

1. Who was Christopher Johnson mc Candless? Answer the question, focusing conditions météorologiques three henchmen phrases in his life.

He to be a jeune American homme who grew up in riche family on the east Coast. He studied at Emory University. After his studies, cette decided à invent himself a nouveau life and go à Alaska.

2. What is thé link between Christopher Johnson tm Candless et Jon Krakauer?

Jon Krakauer wrote année article conditions météorologiques Johnson ™ Candess’s death pour Outside Magazine. Then he wrote Johnson mc Candess’s biography, entitled “Into thé Wild”.

3.What can elle deduce about thé literary type of “Into thé Wild”? create the correctement answer.

Biography

Focus nous line 1 à line 15

4. Concentrate nous Christopher Johnson McCandless.a) In je vous demande pardon way to be 1990 a turning point in his life?After graduation native University, hey changed his tons completely: hey “invented a new sapin for himself”, (l.12), “he dropped out du sight” (l.10), he disappeared and “he readjusted his name” (l.10). Hey gave his de largent to charities jaune burnt it et he left tous his belongings behind, (l.10-12).

Voir plus: Meilleur Site Pour Telecharger Anciennes Series Tv Gratuitement

b) je vous demande pardon is said about his life before 1990? (Family background, carré where he lived, studies and achievements).

He flourished up in a well-to-do household (l.1)In a riche suburb du Washington (l.6-7)He learned at Emory university (l.9)He graduated through honors (l.9)He excelled academically (l.7)He was année elite athlete(l.7)

c)What did he faire in 1992?He left his old habitent to go and live in Alaska (l.1-2)

5. McCandless was “in search de raw transcendant experience” (l.14). Explain, using facets from thé text.

He wanted à experience in année authentic et simple way: rawHe wanted to live a transcender experience, the is venir say, ont the spirituality experience of living without any type of possessions, rejecting a materialistic society.

6. Why did Jon Krakauer initially write around Christopher Johnson McCandless?The editor of Outside magazine asked Jon Krakauer venir report nous the circumstances ns McCandless’s death after his corps was discovered.

Focus nous line 16 to line 33.

7. Jon Krakauer to write that hey was “unwilling to let McCandless go” (l.20).a) what does this declare reveal about the évolution of Jon Krakauer’s interest in McCandless?Quote auto words he used à define his interest.He came to be more and more involved et even obsessed v McCandless.-“Fascination with McCandless” (l.17)-“I was haunted by” (l.19)-“With an interest that bordered nous obsession” (l.22-23)

b) quel causes this evolution? discover three reasons.- McCandless’ tragic destiny (“the boy’s starvation” (l.21-22); “convoluted path that commander to his death” (l 21)- broader issues the histoire raises (the appeal of “wilderness”, auto appeal of “high-risk activities parce que le young men”, “father and son relationship” (l.24-26)- identification with McCandless “unsettling parallels in between events in his life et those in my own” (l. 20) “struck a an individual note” (l.28-29)

8. “I won’t claim à be an impartial biographer”(l.28)a) what does this comment show about Jon Krakauer’s intentions?He wanted to be neutral and objective once writing thé biography.

b) comment does cette feel about thé result?He is rather satisfied oui he saus “I ont tried – and largely succeed, ns think- à minimize ma authorial visibility (l.30-31)

c) Did he fully succeed?No, hey did seul succeed partially oui he warns auto reader that cette had to comprendre emotionally involved: “Candless’s étrange tale struck a personal noter that fabriquer a dispassionate rendering du the tragedy impossible” (l.28-29).

Voir plus: Rue Du 71Ème Ri Saint Brieuc Agglomération, Pays De Saint Brieuc

9. Comment does the nature of his attention affect thé objectivity ns his narrative? Why? Justify her answer with three different ideas.He is not an objective biographer because:- hey adds his personal thoughts conditions météorologiques related subjects “I inevitably came à reflect on other, larger subjects as well” (l.23-24)- cette is emotionally involved: “Candless’s strange tale struck a personal remarque that made a dispassionate rendering ns the la tragédie impossible” (l.28-29).- he includes aspects from his own first “I interrupt McCandless’s histoire with fragments of a narrative drawn from mien own youth” (l.31-32)